Sunday, January 17, 2010

New Banksters Same As The Old Banksters: "People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders."

Don't let anybody EVER tell you the Owners do not conspire against the people. From a page entitled The Federal Observer, here'sw a fascinating document which supports such allegations. According to the site, the document was "Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, SR from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens. (Emphases supplied--W)
The Bankers Manifesto of 1892
"We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance.

The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.

At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation.

The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.

When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand (sic) their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."
This--1892--was just at the dawn of the age of massification. Inside 20 years, Freud's favorite nephew, Edouard Bernays, would have worked out the dynamics of media manipulation in the manufacture of consent (his phrase), precisely through he expedient of fomenting antagonisms. History--"Divide and Conquer"--does repeat itself, tactically...


Anonymous said...

The Fredos. Example:::
Ann's so smart. If only she'd just be good and do the right thing. I'm afraid the God's compelled her to fall on her own sword becaust of her willingness to be evil. Again.
Ann allegedly buys Mike a Charger's jersey. She gets me a plain t-shirt, like an undershit.
How clever. The joke here is she may have just costed the Chargers a SuperBowl.
I had the Chargers as my home page for a long time. I'm not saying that could have won it for them, for they do have big troubles getting over this hump they so regularly stumble on, but Mike receiving that jersey WAS enough to cost them their chance at sucess.
When this ocurrs and they lose against the Jets or in the Championship game it is safe to examine whether Mike costed the 1979 Chargers, for they were his favorite team.
Guess what tought guy?? You ARE important!!! Congrats.
Neither of you are welcome in San Diego any longer.
That guy's a bona-fide jinx.
Your season's over San Diego.

Woody (Tokin Librul/Rogue Scholar/ Helluvafella!) said...